November 2009 Newsletter |
CALIFORNIA | TEXAS | ||
No specific list or minimal number of letter-sound corre- spondences exists that 1st grade Reading programs must teach. |
1st grade Reading programs must teach at least 70 specified letter-sound correspondences. | ||
Minimum average decodability of 1st graders' reading selections must be 75%. |
Minimum average decodability of 1st graders' reading selections must be 80%. | ||
Some 1st grade student reading selections may not count toward this 75% figure. |
All 1st grade student reading selections count toward this 80% figure. | ||
Total average decodability of five 1st grade Reading programs is 89.6%. |
Total average decodability of four 1st grade Reading programs is 94%. | ||
Four of these five California programs unsoundly teach more phonetically- regular than irregular words as sight words. |
65% of all student reading selections in five 1st grade Reading programs are at least 90% decodable. |
82.5% of all student reading selections in four 1st grade Reading programs are at least 90% decodable. |
One of these four Texas programs unsoundly teaches more phonetically- regular than irregular words as sight words. |
Five programs teach an average of 95 still- undecodable phonetically- regular words as sight words. |
Four programs teach an average of 74 still- undecodable phonetically- regular words as sight words. | ||
Five programs teach an average of 74 phonetically-irregular words as sight words. |
Four programs teach an average of 79 phonetically-irregular words as sight words. | ||
Two programs wrongly ask 1st graders to "read" still- undecodable words while developing oral vocabulary. |
No programs wrongly ask 1st graders to "read" still- undecodable words while developing oral vocabulary. |