Flawed definitions of states' rights, judicial activism, judicial restraint, and strict and loose construction; fails to identify trinitarian versus unitarian sove­reign­ty as a key conflict in constitutional history

---

Baffling student text discus­sions of strict and broad construction, of judicial restraint and judicial acti­vism, of states' rights and state sovereignty; silence on trinitarian constitution­alism; no explanation of unitarian rejection of it in the 20th century